?

Log in

Aug. 7th, 2007

Surrender

(no subject)

Is there such a thing as over-control? Can you ever control someone to such a point where they cease to be able to function at a human level. To have such a level of programming that without their controller they cease to be able to function on a daily level? Is such programming a good thing?

I bring the above questions up because someone posted in a community that I belong to about how their owner completely pre-filters every bit of information that they receive. Television, movies, websites, news, etc. are all pre-screened to ensure that it doesn't interfere with the programming the owner has taken care to manifest. I wonder if that owner were to suddenly pass away if the girl in question could deprogram rapidly enough to assimilate back into the world or would she flounder and struggle until she found another situation similar to her present one.

Now, a little poll because I'm a male whore for input from those who still read this thing!

Poll #1035381 female roles & perceptions

Is it a female's place to serve men?

Yes - always
3(75.0%)
Yes - only if they show they are worthy
0(0.0%)
No (explain in comments)
1(25.0%)

Is it appropriate for a man to expect the female to accept an inferior role

Yes (explain in comments)
3(75.0%)
No (explain in comments)
1(25.0%)

Check the statements where you agree. A female should accept...

that her value is determined by men.
0(0.0%)
that her sole focus should be on being found pleasing.
0(0.0%)
that her sexuality and sexual role will be decided by men.
0(0.0%)
when in a relationship her limits will be decided by the man
0(0.0%)
that the man will have great freedoms that the female does not
0(0.0%)

A female's ability to conceive is fair game for a man to control?

Yes
2(50.0%)
No
2(50.0%)

A female should always retain control over:

her finances
0(0.0%)
her appearance (weight, hair style, body mods, etc.)
0(0.0%)
reproduction
0(0.0%)
limits
0(0.0%)
friendships
0(0.0%)
sexuality
0(0.0%)
her career
0(0.0%)

Would you ever get involved with someone who believed females were inferior or meant to serve men?

Yes, if I found one for real
0(0.0%)
Yes, I already am
2(100.0%)
No way, we're equals and that's the way it should be
0(0.0%)

Mar. 21st, 2007

Surrender

(no subject)

Is it really that hard to be honest? How can someone be trusted in their submission if their loyalty and honesty is in question? How can any forward progress be made when there is a veil of secrecy and suspicion that has built up over a period of years?

*sigh* I'm just tired of being lied to by people. All I ask is honesty.

Mar. 7th, 2007

Surrender

Answers #3

If you had the ability to cause someone's death by closing your eyes and whispering 'goodbye' three times, and picturing their death in your head...

Would you use that ability?


No. I will tell you why. It isn't some altruistic, everyone deserves to live bullshit. Some people deserve to die and they get exactly what their due is. However, just blinking my eyes and they die would deny me the pleasure of making it last. I mean, if you are going to jump that hurdle, not saying I ever could or couldn't, you better enjoy it. For a sadist that means dragging out the process and reveling in the anguish the person endures.

But what about mercy killings where you are helping someone who is really sick by killing them? I still wouldn't do it because I'm not the creator and I have no right to end their journey prematurely than I do to extend it by virtue of keeping them alive on machines when their body is ready to give out.

I don't know if that answers your question or not, but it's the only answer I could come up with at the moment.
Tags:
Surrender

Answers #2

Hmmm... what's your favorite type of play? ::wink wink nudge nudge::

That is tough because I tend to play in one of two ways with someone. I play either very sensually or very rough with s&m.

When I play sensually, I tend to use teasing and light touch, usually coupled with restraint or other stimulus that compels compliance with my directions. My goal in these types of scenes is usually to turn the girl into a puddle of girl goo while holding her at bay from achieving the release she so richly desires. If I had to pick something within this category I would have to say playing with my 2" long brass claws. They are wonderful for both types of play but they are extremely effective for making a girl squirm.

When I play roughly, I feed the beast inside me. It has nothing to do with her pleasure or fun. The screams, her pain it is all food for the inner beast. Pushing the edges, shoving her toward her limits. In these scenarios the girl becomes a tool to satisfy my own needs for pleasure. I prefer to use blades, needles, painful bondage and impact toys to achieve this.

Both types of play are important and necessary for me to be wholely satisfied.
Tags:
Surrender

Answers #1

For what purpose did you make an Lj? :)

My purpose in making this journal was to have a free space to express my views and thoughts on things. I had a side hope of finding other people just as freaky as me. So, nothing earth shaking like wanting to change the world.
Tags:

Mar. 6th, 2007

Surrender

What the hell... Questions

Ask me a single question. It can be any question and I *will* answer it.

Comments are screened to protect the nasty and naughty.

Feb. 14th, 2007

Surrender

Predatory instinct

I'm feeling predatory tonight. This isn't anything new, men have felt this way for ages. Men would vent this predatory nature by raiding other tribes and making off with their women. We're more civilized now but the nature is still there. He who is the strongest rules. If you can't protect what is yours then you're merely holding onto it for someone until they come to get it. In our world physical strength isn't the only measure. Mental strength and possession of an unshakable will are also very powerful tools for a man.

I am tired so I'm going to stop there for now.

Jan. 27th, 2007

Surrender

(no subject)

It has long been my belief that lower does not always indicate lesser. In ancient times the philosopher served the student, educating him and training him in the arts. The student was usually from a higher social class but the philosopher was certainly not a lesser person for this because he possessed skills and traits of value.

So then, the question of the role of the woman is posed. Because she is lower than a man in traditional societies and within certain segments of the BDSM community (a segment that I subscribe to myself) does this truly make her lesser than the man? I would argue that her lower class role is essential to the survival of men for she possesses things that a man doesn't. For instance, it is impossible for a man to become pregnant. That is a trait of value for women because the survival of the race depends on reproduction. But is this it? Is this the only thing that keeps a woman from being both lower and lesser?

Obviously, a man may ask for a woman's opinion but he doesn't place nearly as heavy a weighting on it as he does his own or the opinions of his male friends. So the ability for a woman to have an opinion, even an intelligent one, does not provide an adequate justification to raise her up from lesser status.

What about her natural instinct to raise and care for children? This is not so natural an instinct as you might believe. Perhaps it was at one time, but our entitlement society and generations of teaching that women have greater purpose watered down this instinct. I've been witness to far too many lousy mothers to believe otherwise. I believe that this turning away from the way things were originally designed biologically and trying to force a change is permanently altering the evolutionary plan. That is the topic for another post as I wish to stay on topic here.

What about cooking, cleaning and other housework? Are women the ones skilled in these endeavors? Do they provide the qualities needed to raise a woman up from lesser being to merely being of lower status? I would argue that no, these skills are not inherent to all women and not all women can learn to do them well.

Or is it perhaps that lesser is to be judged individually and lower is a class distinction shared by all women? This would grant those who acquire or possess skills and traits to an acceptable level, obviously determined by men, to be deemed as having achieved a level above lesser beasts.

I am missing things, I know, but the post is already getting longer than intended for so early on a Saturday and I wish to leave some things open for discussion. So, discuss.

Jan. 26th, 2007

Surrender

The first of many

I am a realist, I don't expect much from people, really, just honesty and a level of trust appropriate for the relationship.

Some of the things that will appear in this journal:

1) Posts relating how pathetically sad and impotent the current administration is at doing anything of real benefit to the citizens.

2) Kinky stuff relating to power exchange and sex. Some of it will be hypothetical and some of it based on reality.

3) Pimping for various causes that are important to me.

4) Polls to gauge reader response to various issues and topics.

5) Discussion generating thoughts about any topic that strikes me.

6) The occasional meme when it seems to promote understanding of my views, my life or my beliefs.

7) Anything else I deem necessary or worthwhile to share.

Don't crowd, there's plenty of me to go around to everyone. The line starts here so add me and comment so I actually get some form of notification that I have a new friend. Commenting with something worthwhile about yourself is always a plus and more likely to receive an add back. If you can't be bothered than add me and take your chances. :)